What about allowing retailers to operate medical clinics? In 2015, New York had only 18 such clinics, “one of the lowest penetration rates, per capita, nationally,” according to a report produced by the United Hospital Fund. Other states have more retail clinics because they allow them to be staffed by physician assistants and nurse practitioners. New York requires physicians to man the few clinics in the state.The established medical industry doesn’t want to compete with mid-level professionals for patients, so its leaders try to limit the growth of retail clinics by sowing fears about the quality of care. When asked about Cuomo’s proposal, the president of the Medical Society of the State of New York argued that “the care that is given in these settings . . . is not optimal.”In reality, patients who visit retail clinics are likely to be treated as well as they are at doctors’ offices, but at much lower cost. The leading study, which appeared in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2009, found that retail clinics consistently charged less for services that were also delivered at physicians’ offices, urgent-care centers and emergency rooms.For example, an initial evaluation that averaged $66 at a retail clinic cost $106, $103 and $358 at a physician’s office, urgent-care center and emergency room, respectively. On the quality front, the Annals study found that retail clinics were indistinguishable from doctors’ offices and urgent-care centers — and better than ERs.The conclusion? “Retail clinics provide less costly treatment . . . with no apparent adverse effect on the quality of care of [the] delivery of preventive care.”Other studies have yielded similar findings. A 2011 study in the American Journal of Medical Quality found that “the quality of care delivered to [children] by [retail clinics] meets or exceeds that provided in other health care settings.”A 2013 study in the American Journal of Managed Care found that patients who visited retail clinics generated lower total treatment costs than similar patients who were treated elsewhere.
A 2014 study published in the same journal found that, nationwide, CVS’s MinuteClinics outperformed ambulatory-care facilities and emergency rooms when treating earaches, strep throat and urinary-tract infections.The more interesting question isn’t about the merits of Cuomo’s executive order and budget proposal. It’s about whether we should allow doctors to continue to control the delivery of health care. That approach has brought us absurd prices, ever-spiraling spending, surprise bills for out-of-network treatments, long waits for office visits, general unfriendliness to consumers and excessive numbers of health-care-related infections, complications and deaths.
In 2016, researchers again studied the treatment of earaches in children and again found that retail clinics were substantially cheaper than other providers and every bit as good.Maybe we should let retailers take a shot at fixing these problems. Across many domains, retailers have figured out how to offer goods and services conveniently and affordably. When people shop at Costco, they know everything they buy will be priced reasonably and that they can return anything they don’t like.
Imagine how much better, more affordable and more pleasant health care would be if doctors’ offices and hospitals were just as devoted to customer service.
David A. Hyman, is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute and law professor at Georgetown University Law Center. Charles Silver is a law professor at University of Texas School of Law.
The article “CUOMO’S SMART ATTACK ON THE FLU — AND MDS’ MONOPOLY ON BASIC CARE” was originally published in the New York Post – https://nypost.com/2018/01/28/cuomos-smart-attack-on-the-flu-and-mds-monopoly-on-basic-care/